 | | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
|
Paul Sinasohn expounded: (...) I guess the way I'd read it, you would owe a train window and a green cylinder. What about using your original idea of following the rules in order with no going back? How would that interpret your scenario? Something (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
|
I really think this box will die a horrible, quick death. Once you get more than about 3 rules going, many people are going to get the box, and have NOTHING that meets the rules to grab a piece they want. I would have zero interest in such a box. At (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
|
(...) (Chris replied) (...) Paul expounds: Here's an example: Rule 1: If you take any 2x2x1 round cylinders, put in an equal # of train windows Rule 2: If you take 1x4 bricks, put in 2x2 bricks Rule 3: If you take out anything that is blue, put in (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
|
My thinking is that the person with the box only has to follow the one rule they choose. At that point in the receive-trade-send cycle, they are just dealing with the (potential) mess other people have left. So the current box-holder shouldn't have (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Box #2
|
|
Sign me up as well! Scott S. (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
