|
|
 | | Pictures!
|
| Here are some mix pix! In some ways, there is a bit too much rhyme and reason to the bagging; but that's just how it turned out over the past few years. Some sorting was required while building the sets that the mixes originated from. Some of these (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | | | Re: Addresses
|
| (...) Yeah, those are they're all taken, but jeez: not only is a dedicated domain overkill for something like this, it's a step backwards (fragmentation rather than aggregation). (...) Since it has the same site-wide integration potential as (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | | | Re: New group...moving forward?
|
| (...) I ought to clarify that a bit -- I'm not offering to write anything to handle this _yet_. I think later it will all fit in nicely with the rest of the infrastructure. (I just can't make it a priority anytime relatively soon.) Having multiple (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | | | Re: Announcement: New jambalya...who wants it?
|
| For that matter, Doug, is there anything you're after? I'm going to dump in a dozen minifigs, unless there are lots in already...maybe some 1x4s And Doug, I'll need your address, too... Paul Sinasohn (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
| | | | | Re: Addresses
|
| I agree that it's not a critical concern for most people. The main advantage is a smooth and reliable system to avoid the redundant and inefficient "someone send me an address" posts. Of course, whenever you implement a system that holds a users (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
|
