 | | Re: Addresses
|
|
(...) Why? I don't get the concern. I'm more concerned about my email address than my postal address. (...) For different reasons and in different ways I appreciate the idea of having some semi-automated double blind doohicky and also just having no (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcement: New jambalya...who wants it?
|
|
(...) I dunno exactly what I'm expecting, but I am going to drop in at least a few of those conical space rocket tail pieces which other people seem to like. I haven't yet compiled a list of what other pieces I'll be doing; I guess I need to do that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcement: New jambalya...who wants it?
|
|
Killer! Jeremy, Mookie, any specific (or general types of) parts you'd like to see in there after I'm through with it? Me, I'm apt to take pieces from every theme and replace them with an equal mishmash. :-) Doug (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: Addresses
|
|
(...) I'm not so concerned about other LUGNuts, but there is the possibility of a public, centralized address list being exploited by an motivated envelope-stuffer. (...) Wow, that sounds keen. A little bit more work, but not too much. Where would (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Addresses
|
|
This is a great Idea, however what we really need is a secure system of getting the recipient address to the sender. Does anyone have any Ideas? I don't think anyone wants a centralized list of mailing addresses to exist. How about this: 1. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
