 | | Re: Thoughts on Brickbay fees (Re: Brickbay problems........again) —Jan-Albert van Ree
|
| | | (...) That MIGHT work, although some people might stop listing small batches of parts because it makes the profit margin even smaller. (...) 2a seems VERY unfair to certain sellers. If a seller had some very rare parts, priced "fair" he might still (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on Brickbay fees (Re: Brickbay problems........again) —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) Every lot listed on Brickbay consumes resources. Those resources might be bandwidth, disk space, etc. If someone has two 'Yellow 1 x 2 Brick's listed, the odds are small that those would be desirable parts. They have an intrinsic value that is (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on Brickbay fees (Re: Brickbay problems........again) —Paul Janssen
|
| | | | (...) I've commented on this before, but want to bring it up in the context of the point raised above. Suppose you have 800 yellow 1x2 bricks listed, and a buyer buys all but a few, lets say 798, (this stuff does happen, and often) then you only (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on Brickbay fees (Re: Brickbay problems........again) —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Paul Janssen writes: <snip> (...) (IMHO) There are several schools of thought on this topic. One way of looking at it is that the sale of the 798 should carry/cover the cost of keeping the remaining stock listed (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| | | | |
