 | | Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
|
Doug Finney <dfinney@wt.net> wrote in message news:FpDEwp.GBz@lugnet.com... (...) [snip] (...) Highly agreed! Although it is easy to pick a person apart on listings, let's save our energy attacking and slandering the people who list sets currently (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
|
In lugnet.market.auction, Mike Poindexter writes: Ignoring the nitpicking (polybags and 50's/60's sets)... (...) No, I think the disagreement is more about what is in mint condition, not what mint is. The title of the auction in question was "LEGO (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
|
massive editing for space I believe time has come to stop arguing about dictionary definitions. More often than not what a word actually means in context is different from the definition. In the context of a collectable "whatever" environment, in (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another CLUELESS about MIB
|
|
massive editing for space I believe time has come to stop arguing about dictionary definitions. More often than not what a word actually means in context is different from the definition. In the context of a collectable "whatever" environment, in (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: FT: Classic Castle minifigs Update #1
|
|
I agree Lar. Leaving the ring on is just tacky. Eric (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
