Subject:
|
Re: LEGO, August 15th Battle Write-up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.us.oh
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:03:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
978 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.us.oh, Drew Lawrence writes:
>
> > Um. I didn't think we had a consensus. I thought we were still going back
> > and forth between LEGOhio and BLOC.
>
> Eh?! I thought we had already decided on LEGOhio?!
We seem to have a group supporting each name. Personally, I favor BLOC.
Sometime back I posted a proposal for a pair of names. Buckeye LEGO Owner's
Club and Brikwar's Legions, Ohio Chapter.
The idea was that the former would be the overall name and the latter would
refer to the BrikWars specific activities/group.
The biggest problem with LEGOhio is the possible trademark issue. BLOC
doesn't use the LEGO name as a sub-part of the acronym and follows proper trade
dress in the expanded form.
Thoughts?
Later,
Gino A...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO, August 15th Battle Write-up
|
| (...) back (...) trade (...) I don't think we could get in any legal trouble for using 'LEGOhio,' as L.E.G.Ohio is an acronym - not "LEGO," which IS trademarked. If we got in legal trouble for having our 'L' stand for Lego, LUGNET and everybody on (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.us.oh)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
