 | | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
|
(...) year (...) The (...) to (...) baby (...) I might be able to come up with tables. I can meet tomorrow, at my place if you like, but then not again until two weeks from today. Jimmy (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
| |
| | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
|
Tomorrow is no good for me. Next week would be good as I am on vacation all week. Not going anywhere but not going to work either! Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com James Beerman wrote in message ... (...) seemed to (...) the (...) bandwidth (...) (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
| |
| | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
|
Replying to my own post ... Probably the single most important decision to made is on modular tables. To do this right means making a sound decision and learning from the two active train groups (GMTLC and PNTLC). Since I there is no way I could do (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
| |
| | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
|
Mike Walsh wrote in message ... (...) a (...) I agree with Mike, lets go with the PNLTC tables (I think the California folks are going to use this standard also). If we can get together sometime to do an assembly line construction, I'd be happy to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
| |
| | Re: meeting (was Re: train club)
|
|
I did not see the 4560 set in Sweden, only 4561. I'm not sure luggging a train set back would be very easy either! Those boxes are pretty large. I will take a look while I am there and let you know. I learned from my last trip, I will throw an extra (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.nc.ral, lugnet.loc.us.nc)
|
