To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sfOpen lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / United States / California / San Francisco / 656
    Re: Structural weakness in MOCs? —Tom McDonald
   (...) Ugg.. Zonker-man speakum truth.. I'll be sure to do testing at home too. But the good thing is that there won't be any (shouldn't be any) "unskilled handling" and "creative re-building" of stock like there was at BayLUG's first meeting, not (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
   
        Re: Structural weakness in MOCs? —Tom Stangl
   Speaking of which, until we have modules, etc for a layout with hidden controllers, does anyone have a spare 9V wire to sacrifice? What I'm thinking is that if you get a 9V wire, cut one plate off and put a plug on it, you can feed the "main" (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
   
        Electricity in layout (was Re: Structural weakness in MOCs?) —Tom McDonald
   (...) thinking is (...) feed (...) It might not. I don't like doing that cuz IMO it'll strain the 317 regulator to put out what it's supposed to. Even if it could put out 9V with a 7.5V supply, I can't imagine the current remaining the same. I know (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
   
        Re: Electricity in layout (was Re: Structural weakness in MOCs?) —James Powell
    (...) The person with a lot of experence is Dan Parker dnvpark@gte.net He has done a lot of the rerigging of the stuff for PNLTC, and likely can answer your questions...that or he knows who to ask! James P (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR