 | | Re: Second BayLUG get-together (8/99) summary —Russell Clark
|
| | | (...) The kids dids were much more manageable this time. (...) I am planning a moving set-up for next time. (...) We definitely need a "play area." (...) I think we need a formal meeting. One thing I would like is a "Hi. I'm so and so." I kept (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Second BayLUG get-together (8/99) summary —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | (...) Do y'all think that the lack of a play area helped the kids be a bit more under control too? Note that I am not against the play area idea: on the contrary I'm for it. I'm just asking if it's true in your opinion. A play area might be a (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Third BayLUG get-together (11/99) planning —Zonker Harris
|
| | | | I should have measured the height of the tables in Fukaya...how much is the heighth difference between those tables and my PNLTC table? :-) We can plan to take over a few tables for the trains. Yes, we should ponder over a layout (one or two loops, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Third BayLUG get-together (11/99) planning —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) <grunt> (...) <double grunt> (...) Good idea. FWIW, I don't care what the layout looks like. I mean I do, but I've never done one, so I'd like to see how others do it. (...) Good ideas. Maybe one of the two loops can be for trains which aren't (...) (25 years ago, 12-Aug-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| | | | |
