|
| | Re: Name of Club
|
| I did not go to the last get together, but I wanted to very badly, so all of you don't know me from Adam, but here's my $.25.. I think either baylug.org or sfbaylug.org is perfect because: 1) they are intuitive urls; 2) "L" is for Lego, which is at (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | Re: Name of Club
|
| (...) I disagree. Model railroader groups tend not to be brand-specific. Similarly with craft groups such as beading, knitting, and the like. I'm sure we can find lots of examples of both brand-specific and non-brand-specific groups, but I'd rather (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | Erics comments
|
| Eric must have a flame-retardent suit on when he says this: (...) Blasphemy! There ARE no other brands of building bricks. Fred - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fred Yokel Design 2635 North First Street, Suite 204 San Jose, CA 95134 (408) (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | Re: Name of Club
|
| Or ask Lego if it's ok to include their name? Seems to me that they'd prefer not to acknowledge the existence of "plug-compatible" bricks. [techie allusion intended] (...) Why? The others aren't nearly as good as the original. Do you have a (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | re: Name of Club
|
| Points made in prior messages: (1) "users group" term too techish (2) "Lego" word might be trademark problem I agree with these points. Besides, I think it's reasonable to include other brands of building bricks instead of restricting the discussion (...) (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| |