 | | Re: Post RLD Fest confirmed @Twickenham 11 August 10am
|
|
"Phil Traviss" <phil.traviss@xpertsystems.com> wrote in message news:H0qCDo.2yI@lugnet.com... (...) Seconded. The whole weekend was excellent. I guess it's been so quiet in here due to people sorting through their '1Kg' :-) Chloe says thanks to (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Post RLD Fest confirmed @Twickenham 11 August 10am
|
|
...and thirded.. I had a great 2 days and certainly got my money's worth. Thanks to those of you who entertained my daughter, Rebecca, on Sunday. I think she's better at trading than I am, assuming you want to collect frogs or fish.... Now what can (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Post RLD Fest confirmed @Twickenham 11 August 10am
|
|
Hi guys Thank you, to all involved in a great weekend. The people at Legoland Windsor where just the best. and the Lego parts we all got was overwhelming. I just wish I could have stayed longer at the post RDL fest as I had a flight to catch,(back (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Post RLD Fest confirmed @Twickenham 11 August 10am
|
|
(...) postcard (...) such a (...) 560 Mark (whoose pyramid is only ~20 bricks high with no bracing) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Post RLD Fest confirmed @Twickenham 11 August 10am
|
|
(...) I believe the formula you should be using is h*(h-1) 2x4s plus 1 2x2 where h is the height of the pyramid in bricks so the answer for a 32 high is 992. (Huw: Please imagine this message is a postcard!) HTH, Phil in Yorkshire (still sorting) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Post RLD Fest confirmed @Twickenham 11 August 10am
|
|
(...) I also think it was excellent. I am already looking forward to the next event in Oktober. I hope to see you all again in two month time. Christian (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Post RLD Fest confirmed @Twickenham 11 August 10am
|
|
(...) h (...) Excellent, thanks Phil. I did what turns out to be a similar calculation, and got just over 1000, but I think yours is more mathematically correct. Huw (22 years ago, 21-Aug-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
