 | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| (...) OK then, I'll pack my two carriage metroliner and clubcar, guess we need to fill all those platforms! (...) If it receives half the response your station did then I'd be happy! size wise its about 1m square, but I have tried to use a modular (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| "Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@brisc...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GCCGMw.9wH@lugnet.com... (...) I have a new station - straight through instead of terminus However, we can arrange things however we want - change it through the day. One issue (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| (...) Sounds good, I started one of these a while back, but abandonded as I am low on glass bricks. (...) Quite, but like you theres no real way I'd get my station on a table. What some people might not realise (we do as we've been there) is that (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| "Jason Briscoe" <jason-shirley@brisc...rve.co.uk> wrote in message news:GCCHwr.CID@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) My concern too. Long term I will knock together my own table with proper legs (...) that (...) even (...) queue? (...) Absolutely - the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| (...) It sounds like I am being outnumbered here... I agree, it is looking impractical given the size of yours and Jason's stations. Huw (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: SCLF wants!
|
| (...) I'd prefer a loop layout on a ring of tables too Huw, as it makes the trains easier to see. Would we have enough track for two layouts? A couple of loops on tables and an end-to-end run between these two stations? If short of space, I don't (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
