To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.ukOpen lugnet.loc.uk in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / United Kingdom / 5722
5721  |  5723
Subject: 
Re: Most useless plentiful part?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.uk
Date: 
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:03:58 GMT
Viewed: 
409 times
  
In lugnet.loc.uk, Huw Millington writes:

Yes, and cyan.

I like them a lot for the reason you state -- they are good for modular
designs, where joining subassemblies requires friction pins, but putting one
in is impossible without destroying them.

Huw

Without destroying what? the pin or the sub-assembly? and doesn't that just
vindicate my assertion that these parts are indeed useless.

Lego Mad Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Most useless plentiful part?
 
(...) No, he means when you can't get in to the gap to fit a friction pin. So, you push one of these half-into the sub-assembly, then when you bring two sub-assemblies together you can just push them right through to hold it all together. This is (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Most useless plentiful part?
 
Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G7yywG.Et6@lugnet.com... (...) Yes, and cyan. I like them a lot for the reason you state -- they are good for modular designs, where joining subassemblies requires friction pins, but putting one (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR