To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.ukOpen lugnet.loc.uk in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / United Kingdom / 5726
5725  |  5727
Subject: 
Re: Most useless plentiful part?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.uk
Date: 
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:39:41 GMT
Viewed: 
443 times
  
In lugnet.loc.uk, Steve Lane writes:
In lugnet.loc.uk, Jason J. Railton writes:

No, he means when you can't get in to the gap to fit a friction pin.  So,
you push one of these half-into the sub-assembly, then when you bring two
sub-assemblies together you can just push them right through to hold it all
together.  This is actually shown in the instructions for the 8428 Turbo
Command car.  And I've got some orange ones.  :-P

Jason.

He should have used the word dismantling then, rather than destroying. That
would have made it clearer.


If one assembles, one dismantles.
If one creates, one can destroy.

'To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy
can be the thoughtless act of a single day' -  Churchill

Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Most useless plentiful part?
 
(...) Oh good grief. Is this the sort of drivel that's going to be left if we take the trading out to another group? Right. Roll up! Roll up! Step right up! Get your lovely LEGO 'ere. How much would you expect to pay madam... Jason. (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Most useless plentiful part?
 
(...) He should have used the word dismantling then, rather than destroying. That would have made it clearer. Steve (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)

11 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR