Subject:
|
Re: UK to US money transfers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 17:45:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
279 times
|
| |
|
|
> For $12, I'd just send it in a letter, with enough sheets of paper so
> that the money can't be seen through the envelope. Although Todd's just
> suggested wrapping it in foil in a thread somewhere else, which sounds
> like a good idea.
Why foil?
I have sent cash through international mail ok, but did wonder if it
could be 'sniffed out' by dogs, machines or people with very sensitive
hooters. Maybe I have answered my own question.
Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: UK to US money transfers
|
| On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Ian Bishop (<eBnuerAPvIG4EwKF@g...mon.co.uk> ) wrote at 17:45:51 (...) I don't think it's 'foil-wrapped for freshness', it's just that light doesn't pass through the metal, so no-one can tell what's inside :-) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | Re: UK to US money transfers
|
| (...) Ian, please dont say "people with very sensitive hooters" as I get into a fit of laughter every time I read your line ,-) -breiler (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: UK to US money transfers
|
| On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, dakershaw (<FKB9Bx.Mq1@lugnet.com>) wrote at 11:31:09 (...) IMOs do exist. I use them all the time. But until recently, I worked for a bank, so it was easy. I believe they cost GBP7.50. For $12, I'd just send it in a letter, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
