 | | Tower Building —Liam Parnell
|
| | | (...) Oops, I was a bit confusing there. I meant what you said originally. ie 3 types of section: base,mid and top. There can of course be lots of mids. I will shut up now! I meant it was simpler than my less specific scheme which would allow a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Tower Building —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Liam Parnell (<99100720152607.009...rrender2>) wrote at 18:54:53 (...) Righty ho. A base, middle sections and a top. Form an orderly queue :-) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Tower Building —Ian Bishop
|
| | | | (...) That was just my usual tongue-in-cheek banter. I was quite impressed by the ingenuity of the badges made last time around, and have a few tower ideas myself. 40*40 studs seems way too big though, surely. It would preclude most innovative (...) (25 years ago, 9-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Tower Building —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | On Sat, 9 Oct 1999, Ian Bishop (<x9TlRKA7I0$3EwZm@g...on.co.uk>) wrote at 13:25:15 (...) I was thinking about stability and simplicity. The current (evolving) proposal is for everyone to bring their sections, and we'll build the necessary transition (...) (25 years ago, 9-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| | | | |
