Subject:
|
Re: Tower Building
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Oct 1999 23:53:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
378 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Liam Parnell (<99100720152607.00915@surrender2>)
wrote at 18:54:53
> Tony wrote:
> > > Three different size of sections would simplify the project, and
> > > "heighten" the chances of success.
> >
> > Can you expand on this? Do you mean three mid-tower section sizes, plus
> > a base and a top? This would make it easier for people to build
> > sections they're comfortable with, but it's not simpler :-)
>
> Oops, I was a bit confusing there. I meant what you said originally.
> ie 3 types of section: base,mid and top. There can of course be
> lots of mids. I will shut up now!
Righty ho. A base, middle sections and a top. Form an orderly queue :-)
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Tower Building
|
| (...) Oops, I was a bit confusing there. I meant what you said originally. ie 3 types of section: base,mid and top. There can of course be lots of mids. I will shut up now! I meant it was simpler than my less specific scheme which would allow a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
