 | | Re: Lego Posting and Australian Fans
|
|
(...) I suppose in the end, that's what I was really after. Finding out what differnce LEGO posting meant, whether it was such a great thing and whether there was more in place, regulation wise than just common sense. In the end, the argument "We (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Posting and Australian Fans
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, James Howse writes: *lalalala de da....* ---8<---snip a whole bunch of lalala---8<----* (...) Yeah... I'd like to see that too... maybe if we give them a reason to support us... they will... !!???!! (...) You didn't look like a (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Posting and Australian Fans
|
|
I suspect LD will mostly want to post in the theme groups, e.g. announce the rerelease of the Barracuda in the pirates group, or the Sante Fe Super Chief in the train group. I can't see they would have a reason to post in the .loc groups unless it (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Posting and Australian Fans
|
|
(...) If we build it, they will come. (does anyone know the URL for an automatic english - latin translator?) (...) So where do you keep your arms, then? Cheers Richie (who is short of a bracketed comment on this occassion. Or perhaps not.) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Posting and Australian Fans
|
|
(...) A large tub...what would be the point (from their side of the brick) ? What exactly would LA get, increased sales...nope ! Perhaps a large tub for a play area at a train show for the show flotsam to flog some. But pushing trains is more a LD (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Posting and Australian Fans
|
|
(...) This is about the funniest thing I've read all week. Thanks! :) LFB (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
