Subject:
|
Re: A possible way to get cheaper sets?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 May 2000 06:43:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
621 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
> Just wondering if anyone has looked into what is involved in getting sets
> direct from LA. This could help us lower our costs if we could somehow get
> an account going with LA. I'm sure we could easily get the minimum amount of
> sales, and maybe this way we could have some input on what we have available
> in Aus. [RRP is 40-45% above cost from LA to stores before transport...If
> run in Sydney, this cost could be fairly low]
>
> Anyway, just a thought.
Our NSW group keep talking about this.
It's worth a formal approach I think, and our patronage deserves special
privileges surely :^o
I'm certainly willing to run it/get it started, but we will need to formalise
the group a bit more (...ick).
pete.w
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A possible way to get cheaper sets?
|
| (...) James Howse has already established that LA are not interested in retail sales, and unfortunately they'd classify us as retail, no matter how formalised we became. I think this proposal is a dead horse. I'm still going to work on the LEGO room (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | A possible way to get cheaper sets?
|
| Just wondering if anyone has looked into what is involved in getting sets direct from LA. This could help us lower our costs if we could somehow get an account going with LA. I'm sure we could easily get the minimum amount of sales, and maybe this (...) (25 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
