| | Re: Thanks...
|
| Benjamin Whytcross wrote in message ... (...) near (...) This wasn't due to that minor problem with the replies not threading properly? Surely not. I mean, it doesn't cause any real problems, and nobody would be so anal-retentive as to complain to (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | Thanks...
|
| I'd like to thank everyone in .loc.au and .org.au for the several days of near silence in honour of my day-time posting privaleges being revoked. :) Seriously, why's it gone quiet all of a sudden? Benjamin Whytcross bwhytcro@pacificaccess.com.au (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | Re: Thanks...
|
| (...) We're all too busy building, planning our christmas Lego wish list, writing horrendous criteria based job applications and buying houses. Or maybe that was just me :) cheers sue ann (who's only online so her brain can process ideas in the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | Re: Thanks...
|
| (...) They haven't been revoked. Only the broken tool itself has been banned, and it applies to anyone that uses it. Benjamin, me, you, anybody, any time of day or night. (...) Did you want to start that row all over again somewhere else? There are (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Thanks...
|
| (...) This sounds pretty bad. Is there not technological "fix"? Scott A (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | Re: Thanks...
|
| (...) What software are we discussing? Kerry (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| |