Subject:
|
Re: Naming Oz groups (Re:Could we get .org.au up soon)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 03:57:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
494 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Deidre Rushton Brumby [mailto:drb@tasmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 12:20 PM
> > To: lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com
> > Subject: Naming Oz groups (Re:Could we get .org.au up soon)
> >
> >
> > In lugnet.loc.au, Peter Callaway writes:
> > > In lugnet.loc.au, Santosh Bhat writes:
> > > > Yes, once we sort that matter out. But for now we can say • that "Studs" is
> > > > looking after LegOz, until Mugs (Melbourne) & Bugs • (Brisbane) get their act
> > > > together. (*wink* they don't have to use those names)
> > >
> > > I don't know, I think they're great names! <GD&R>
> >
> > Would that make the (as yet non-existent) Tas group the Tugs? Or would
> > that be the Hobart Hugs...
>
> And how about renaming Studs to the Sydney lego users group..SLUGS ?
Nah, we hashed that over at LegOz 2000.3 and we all prefer Studs over Slugs.
Heaps more fun watching peoples reactions to the name :-)
Pete Callaway
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Naming Oz groups (Re:Could we get .org.au up soon)
|
| (...) And how about renaming Studs to the Sydney lego users group..SLUGS ? Benjamin Whytcross BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au Ph: (03) 9856 5282 Directory Technology Pty Ltd 1/436 Elgar Road, Box Hill, 3128 Growing older is compulsory..Growing up (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
