Subject:
|
Re: Naming Oz groups (Re:Could we get .org.au up soon)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 05:01:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
433 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Peter Callaway writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Deidre Rushton Brumby [mailto:drb@tasmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 12:20 PM
> > > To: lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com
> > > Subject: Naming Oz groups (Re:Could we get .org.au up soon)
> > >
> > >
> > > In lugnet.loc.au, Peter Callaway writes:
> > > > In lugnet.loc.au, Santosh Bhat writes:
> > > > > Yes, once we sort that matter out. But for now we can say • that "Studs" is
> > > > > looking after LegOz, until Mugs (Melbourne) & Bugs • (Brisbane) get their act
> > > > > together. (*wink* they don't have to use those names)
> > > >
> > > > I don't know, I think they're great names! <GD&R>
> > >
> > > Would that make the (as yet non-existent) Tas group the Tugs? Or would
> > > that be the Hobart Hugs...
> >
> > And how about renaming Studs to the Sydney lego users group..SLUGS ?
>
> Nah, we hashed that over at LegOz 2000.3 and we all prefer Studs over Slugs.
> Heaps more fun watching peoples reactions to the name :-)
The majority preferred STUDS, i prefer SLUGS or SYDLUG or whatever,
especially after having to explain to the store manager at W4K what a stud
was or wasn't.
pete.w (who couldn't really care anymore)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
