 | | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
(...) Lizards would probably dislike their heads being swapped too. (...) I saw this set in an auction, it looked like painted timber. pete.w (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | RE: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
(...) Just a guess, based on the description, but it sounds like one of the 'town plans' which were pictured in many of the older catalogues. [remembering I don't have the image or net access, so I can't say definitely one way or the other.] Pity (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: To Todd - Could we get .org.au up soon
|
|
(...) Oceania, that's it !!! (that's our world cup soccer group too!) (...) I'm with Shiri on this, let whoever respond, if people break the rules, they get ignored or Todded. (...) for (...) Hmmm, better fix that up shortly ;^) (...) Is that 2c US (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2000.2 catalogue - sexism rules OK?
|
|
(...) Argh! Having just said the road plates were not Lego, I took a closer look at the next picture and they are Lego after all, studs and all. Oh well, I never saw anything so sophisticated here in Australia in my childhood. Kerry (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Aus 2000.2 catalogue scans -sexism rules OK? Very long!
|
|
Forgive the length of this, but this is a topic close to my heart, as I have really tried not to nurture my kids in the predictable societal patterns. My daughter is 11 yrs old and she had matchbox cars and trucks and hammers etc right from the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)
|
