|
|
 | | Re: My average set
|
| (...) Yes! But wait, there's more: My modal set is: [LEGOSet 6706] And the standard deviation is: [LEGOSet 2284] (I'm looking forward to revising all this stuff post Christmas!). Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
| | | | | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
| (...) I'd rather buy the set! After all, all the pieces go into the collection, it is cheaper on a cpp measure. (And I get lots more inspirational pieces besides). (...) Indeed. And used most excellent packaging besides. Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Christmas Shopping
|
| (...) Richie, surprising you moved near the epicentre of expenso-LEGO :^o (...) Let's hope these aren't on sale in Adelaide. (...) A good if expensive source of those swordy things. Far under RRP...is that surprising. (...) TRUe, about the only (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
| | | | | Re: My average set
|
| (...) I'm glad you asked ;-) This set was the closest match to number of parts, number of minifigs and price. These are the most important stats I keep (though I do keep a fair bit more besides). My favourite calculate stat is cpp (cents per piece). (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
| | | | | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
| (...) How can buying a set off the shelf be cheaper than a small number of parts off Bricklick ? I know BL is sometimes pricey, but you could mail 1 x N beams in an envelope connected together and wrapped in tape for $1.50-$2 ish pete.w (who used to (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
