 | | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting
|
|
--snip-- (...) --snip-- (...) The 'up to 3 people' part of the rules is why I started this thread. I hoped to insure that there would be three candidates who could act on Australia-specific issues were they selected. Tim (16 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: BLTG on the screen
|
|
(...) Do you even understand how youtube works? My only intent was to crosspost to lugnet.trains, which you always seem to neglect doing. Don't you think that they'd be interested in the goings on of your train group? (...) Whining snipped (...) (...) (16 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting
|
|
(...) It was a joke, Peter. Are you familiar with the concept at all? (...) No surpsrises there, you sad little man. (...) DGAF. (16 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Ambassadors - nominations/voting
|
|
(...) Good Buddy Kerry has allready informed all the right people that she does not want to be nominated and if you read the rules again you should have asked her first before you published your big words!! As for "Mirth" I have said another phrase (...) (16 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: BLTG on the screen
|
|
(...) Allister It is not "fame at last" Our recognition has been in numerous forms by numerous people and organizations over the past 8 years. It was just unusual for someone to film us and put it on U Tube without letting us know. About 5 years ago (...) (16 years ago, 9-May-08, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
