| |
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 19:29:25 GMT, "James Powell"
<wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes:
> >
> > > I have a copy of Brad's email and I will post it for documentation if he
> > > doesn't happen to come forward to explain more.
> >
> > Not to put you on the spot, but how long do you envision waiting for Brad J.
> > (or somone at Lego) to post explaining their position before you post his
> > email? I'm very interested in insight into (wow, three "in" words in a row)
> > TLC's reasoning behind this request.
> >
> > eric
>
> I'm also voting for this. If you (Todd) are going to cancel a post by someone
> at the behest of Lego (who neither sponsor nor endorse LUGNET), release the
> legal document asking you to remove it. I suspect that it was in the form of a
> 'please remove this, we are displeased' notice, but not a true legal warning.
> In which case, you are CENSORING someone by removing info which they have
> posted.
>
>
>
> From the LUGNET Plan:
>
> 2.
> To help people share information about LEGO products
> and LEGO-related resources on the World Wide Web by
> setting in motion a community-driven knowledge-base.
>
> Where in there does it say that something that a non-TLC employee cannot
> distrbute info which he picked up by using a computer at work, instead of by
> going for a walk down the isle with the lego in it?
>
> This is what Jorge did, in his digital eq. It is the same thing as TLC putting
> up photos, and then getting angry at us for finding them on the web page.
>
> LS James Powell
I will counter with the info from this post that I made that applies
to me, Jorge or anyone else who has "accepted the conditions for
posting" here at Lugnet..
see http://news.lugnet.com/castle/?n=236
The post referenced is about some Castle set info I had, not anything
else but applies here for the info Jorge posted also.
I applaud Todd's removal for the non-public information from Lugnet, I
suspect that John Q Public would have a hard time picking up one of
those machines that Jorge uses and get information from it.....
If you are going to quote parts of the Terms and Conditions from
Lugnet, you should read them ALL....
All other themes are just spare parts for Castle!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) It depends, could a "reasonable" person find them, if they had "reasonable" knowlage of how it worked? (in other words, if Jorge left his price scanner and I picked it up, and tried looking at _all_ the 71xx series lego, would I have found (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I'm also voting for this. If you (Todd) are going to cancel a post by someone at the behest of Lego (who neither sponsor nor endorse LUGNET), release the legal document asking you to remove it. I suspect that it was in the form of a 'please (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
