 | | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) Well, the email I got (order confirmation) shows the following: QTY ITEM DESCRIPTION EUR AMOUNT ***...*** 1 434829 Planes X-Pod 4.99 1 1014846 Assorted Light Grey Plate 4.94 1 434629 Robots X-Pod 4.99 1 434729 Vehicles X-Pod 4.99 1 434929 (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) Let's not forget that this very week we have seen evidence that our complaints have been heard and that TLC is taking action. This is no dead horse in my eyes. My hope is that the bulk parts pack are in fact a trial baloon, and that TLC may (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) I agree! I think about the only thing continuing to beat this dead and now decomposed horse is accomplishing is positioning a few people as whiners in the minds of the great many of us who have by now let the issue go. Its such a nuisance (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) While I agree, I'm completely sick of hearing everyone spout off about this whole thing. Lego has the right do what it wants with its product line. Buy it or don't buy it. There are other things way too important going on to throw a fit about (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) Comment on the clones. KB, TRU, Kroger, and however man more stores that sell Lego. They all put the megablocks near or mixed in with the Lego sets. No wonder parents are confused. Can you blame them. They see the set and the color or image of (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) By your logic, I might as well take a razor blade and slash my arm because I will only lose a small percentage of my life's blood. The real question is how many people LOVE the new colors enough to increase their purchases, not how many people (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The breadcrumbs from the masters table
|
|
"Christian Treczoks" <ct@braehler.com> wrote in message news:HutpDo.1ry4@lugnet.com... (...) Perhaps, but what does the VAT do? Are the labor costs for running the distribution center more? It's really hard to compare prices in two countries (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) for (...) gotten away (...) former (...) I didn't forget, that wasn't the point I was making. The point was that Coke accepted the mistake and changed it back. Why they did it is completely irrelevant. It was just an example that a company, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) Changing back would mean that LEGO management would have to admit the decision was wrong in the first place. This won't happen unless sales drop off badly. This won't happen because most LEGO is bought for kids and it's not likely that this (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
|
(...) You seem to forget that Coke had real competition (Pepsi). If it weren't for lots of pissed-off people abandoning the Coke brand, Coke could have gotten away with the switch. The fact is that a viable alternative did exist, and former "loyal" (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
