 | | Re: 2001 Set info —Ran Talbott
|
| | | (...) No, Lego asked Todd not to publish information they consider "confidential", and he agreed to not do that. You're still free to discuss it. But, if you want to *publish* it somewhere, you'll have to find a publisher that won't honor Lego's (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Either way, the problem is at Target. Once it's out, it's news. Frankly, I find it silly when companies "crack down" on things like this. It's their own fans they're hurting -- and it's the most rabid fanatical ones who *care* about stuff like (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) Exactly. What, precisely, is the point of telling us not to talk about it? The sets might get cancelled? The prices might change? I think anyone reading this information knows that might happen. Competitors might get the info? Uh, so? I'm sure (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | | (...) Even worse, they didn't even ask us. They asked the admin of the site to remove the posts. (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Nick Cameron
|
| | | | | | | (...) reading (...) Ooh, mabey they'll cancel the M****** T* M*** like sets and make pirats!!! NICK #:^A (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Aw, nuts.... I was really looking forward to little Lego music stands in the Minnie The Moocher sets.... JUST JOKING - NO ADVANCE SET KNOWLEDGE IS CLAIMED!!! (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Randy Williams
|
| | | | | | | i agree completely. i didnt get to see the set info before it was canceled, so i dug around and got it from a confidentail source. This is outragues and i think TLG needs to stop overreacting. ps if you want the set info.. .email (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Possibly, but also consider that it is probably far worse to hurt their own legal reputation by letting something like this slide. I can certainly imagine that as part of their investigation and any actions they may take in the future, they (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | (...) Is that your policy Todd? Can I talk all of the about the sets that I know about? If we find out about leaked information (from some other site for example), can we talk about that information in other casual conversations on Lugnet? Ben (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) That's a question for Brad or LEGO Legal via Brad. I am not a lawyer, so I can't give you legal advice on how not to break the law or how to avoid infringing on the LEGO company's rights. The policy is: Don't infringe on anyone's privacy or (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —James Powell
|
| | | | | | | (...) Actually, it is the key question in a court case ongoing in NYC right now...Is a link to a site that contains something illegal if a cease and decease order has been granted? I am refering to DeCSS, and www.2600.com, it makes for interesting (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Do you mean why does LUGNET have this policy/requirement as part of the T&C? Because it benefits the community more in the long run to have this requirement in place than not to have it. Or, from a site survivalist point of view, it benefits (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) Todd: I realise that your best answer for this is the first thing you said here- that you aren't a lawyer- but are you really implying that discussing this information- in any way, in any forum- violates the law or infinges on TLC's rights? I (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) No, I'm not implying that. I believe that it's possible that some things related to this might possibly potentially violate some privacy law somewhere, and I believe that it's potentially likely that some things related to this may be (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Gotta disagree with that one. If it were companies (or individuals, for that matter) who got to decide what their own rights were, we'd all be in trouble. What if they said that "All four-digit numbers are trade secrets. Don't use them."? Of (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) No, LEGO asked Todd to remove certain messages on a thread containing confidential information, thus causing them to discontinue to be published, and he complied with that particular specific legal request. --Todd (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
