Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:54:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2363 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, John Rudy writes:
> I do have a question, though, Suz. What is SO wrong with, "sitewide
> posting," that you must, "answer in the negative?" [...]
I'll stay out of the more heated portion of this and let Suzanne reply to the
other stuff when she gets a free moment, but I can answer the above portion,
at least from my personal viewpoint, by giving links to some previous posts:
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=2201
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/nntp/?n=401
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=4638
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=4636
Thus, the current policy is an attempt to balance two somewhat opposing ideals,
so it's not the type of thing that's inherently right or wrong or good or bad,
but weighing advantages versus disadvantages.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) To Suz et All, I, as many of the members of the community, am thoroughly disappointed with your course of action, Suz. Infantile isn't descriptive enough of a word to talk about what you've just done. Not only have you shot yourself in the (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
