Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:06:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2369 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Thank you, Jake.
> I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1]
>
> Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company
> is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is inexcusable.
>
> -Suz
> LUGNET Admin
>
> [1] Since our last phone conversation a few months ago, in which Jake again
> asked for sitewide posting and I answered in the negative, he has been
> giving this entire community the 'silent treatment' in hopes to 'get his way.'
To Suz et All,
I, as many of the members of the community, am thoroughly disappointed with
your course of action, Suz. Infantile isn't descriptive enough of a word to
talk about what you've just done. Not only have you shot yourself in the
foot, but you've turned a Tommy gun on the entire community, both your
supporters and nay-sayers. I seriously doubt how much TLC is going to deal
with the AFOL community in the future.
I do have a question, though, Suz. What is SO wrong with, "sitewide
posting," that you must, "answer in the negative?" Isn't it enough to ask
all TLG employees to have an Email address at @america.lego.com, or
@denmark.lego.com, or @swaziland.lego.com or any other of the official
address? Can't the community distinguish when Jake is official and not by
his Sig and Address? Or aren't we that smart? Are you saying that someone
can't have a private life which entails their career? Pretty heavy words if
so, considering the number of web designers and programers and the like who,
in their spare time, surf the web, run web-pages and post to newsgroups.
Only time will tell the repercussions of these posts...
...IMHO, LUGNET lay in the balance
-John Rudy
"This thread will go down in history, or in flames, or both..."
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) I'll stay out of the more heated portion of this and let Suzanne reply to the other stuff when she gets a free moment, but I can answer the above portion, at least from my personal viewpoint, by giving links to some previous posts: (4 URLs) (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: [...] (...) Thank you, Jake. I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1] Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
