Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:25:14 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2615 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Thank you, Jake.
> I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1]
>
> Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company
> is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is inexcusable.
>
> -Suz
> LUGNET Admin
>
> [1] Since our last phone conversation a few months ago, in which Jake again
> asked for sitewide posting and I answered in the negative, he has been
> giving this entire community the 'silent treatment' in hopes to 'get his way.'
I am disappointed in you, Suz. Your post was rude and uncalled for, and Jake
deserves an apology. It is also a prime example of why the level of
interaction between the community and Lego has dropped recently. How can you
expect anyone to post on a forum where they recieve such a level of disrespect
from the people who should never show such (i.e., the admins)? Tim Saupe has a
point when he says that Lugnet is going downhill, and I believe the level of
rudeness and disrespect the admins have shown towards both Lego and the
community in general is one of the main causes of this. If the current admins
cannot perform the public relations duties required of administrating such a
large forum, either find people who can, or expect the site to fade into
obscurity as people find other, more pleasent places to converse.
It sure seems that "To enrich the online experience for the LEGO enthusiast in
a growing number of new ways"(1) no longer rings true.
Jeff
1 - http://www.lugnet.com/admin/plan/2.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| Interesting… How you presume to know the intricacy of the situation at hand between two individuals!?! And what is even more fascinating is how you endeavor to draw judgment and call for an “apology” from this individual. And all this regarding a (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: [...] (...) Thank you, Jake. I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1] Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
