Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:19:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2620 times
|
| |
|
|
I have mixed feelings about this whole thread, but the one person that comes
closest to expressing views I can agree with is Ben. I do think there is a
gap that does and probably should exist between "fans" and an official
company person.
I think the desire for greater communication becomes emotionally charged
with the idea of possibly getting "insider" information, which Jake asserts
will not be happening -- so get it once and for all: NO SPECIAL TREATMENT IS
FORTHCOMING! So what do we get with a greater level of communication,
REALLY? Answer: thinly veiled marketing tactics (or euphemistically
"inclusion") more than likely. And frankly, who cares?
I am willing to give the Lugnet admins a lot of latitude here because they
know things we do not know (they essentially have to be in the position of
knowing more). What they know is something that might be good to reveal to
the greater Lugnet community at this time (at least some of it perhaps). I
wrote this in an attempt to give form to some general queries:
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=4618
Anyway, I am not jumping to conclusions either way. Maybe the Lugnet admins
ARE wrong about this issue. Maybe they are PROTECTING Lugnet from becoming
a platform for free advertising for TLC instead.
Can everyone see that this may be far more complicated than what it may seem
on the surface? Check your assumptions at the door.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) Why? I see no reason to differentiate between two people simply because one had the luck and skill to get a job at the same place we would all love to work for. It seems to me that an employee of Lego is more likely to be an AFOL than not, and (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| (...) I know that I personally harbor a fear of LUGNET becoming a platform for free advertising for TLC. I don't really know what harm would befall the community from that, but it seems somehow wrong. I don't know how to express this fear (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: [...] (...) Thank you, Jake. I just wanted to confirm my suspicion.[1] Such a lack of maturity from one who's actions reflect on The LEGO Company is very disappointing. But, your 'using' of this community is (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
