Subject:
|
Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:46:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2452 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Christopher Snead writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes:
>
> (snip)
> First off, I have extreme respect and appreciation for what the Lugnet
> administrators have done. I'm sure the job is a thakless one, and I wanted • you
> all to know that I appreciate the difficulties that arise with such a task.
Couldn't agree more...
> That being said, I want to express my support for a change in policy regarding
> TLG's ability to post elsewhere on Lugnet. • [SNIP]
> I appreciate TLG's desire to be a part of the AFOL community. I hope the • numerous requests to change this policy
> don't fall on deaf ears.
After so many postings have been asking for that change, I just wanted to give
my vote for the 'status quo'. TLC can never be part of the AFOL community: they
are a company that wants to make profit (nothing wrong about that) - we are
adult fans. Of course we can have exchange of minds and any discussion might be
helpful for both sides. Lego Direct is doing a good job and provides us AFOLs
with lots of good stuff, that I never would have expected to see a fe years
ago. I think we can get this stuff, because TLC (Lego Direct) has learned to
listen to us.
> Finally, I'm sure a large number of people recognize your need to keep future
> release plans a secret; but I'm also sure people will continue to ask.
> Responding "We can't discuss that" is perfectly fine, and it let's us know • that
> the concern has been acknowledged...
Agree.
(Another answer could be: 'Information has been forwarded to the xyz-LEGO
department')
To answer on any other requests outside lugnet.lego.direct I think the way
ROSCO has suggested is perfectly ok.
( http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=4626 )
Leg Godt,
Ben
> Thanks for listening!
>
> Chris
>
> P.S. Any plans on releasing some Lego mecha? (Just kidding! Sheesh! ;-) )
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?
|
| In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes: (snip) Just a few things I wanted to express... First off, I have extreme respect and appreciation for what the Lugnet administrators have done. I'm sure the job is a thakless one, and I wanted you all to (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
