| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Mike Walsh writes:
>
> "LUGNET Admin" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message
> news:3af8cf68.29241477@lugnet.com...
>
> [ ... snipped ... ]
>
> >
> > If it bothers you that much to switch back and forth between two posting
> > configurations, simply set up two separate web browsers -- one for
> > official
> > posts and one for personal posts -- until I can fix the web interface to
> > make it easier for you to switch directly.
So fix it already. Until you do I suggest that what really matters is the
*SIGNATURE* on the post. NOT the email address associated with it.
> > Or, if that's too much work, use
> > your web browser for posting official messages and your newsreader for
> > posting private messages. Or, if that's too much work, borrow someone
> > else's computer who doesn't use their web browser often and make official
> > posts from there. Or, if that's still too much work, restrict yourself to
> > posting officially only from your computer at work and posting privately
> > only from your computer from home. At any rate, please, no more official
> > LEGO posts from your personal email account. Thanks. Questions...feel
> > free to call us on the phone.
> >
> > --
> > Todd S. Lehman | LUGNET Admin <todd@lugnet.com>
Guess what. I decided this was an offical statement by the sig. I didn't
even look at the email address.
> >
> > [cc Brad Justus via email]
>
> I read this article this morning and my initial thought was "great, here we
> go again". Let's alienate a valuable source of information again.
Hear hear.
>
> Todd, if you don't want the LD employees to do this, then you have the
> responsibility to make it easy for them to switch posting IDs. I don't
> think that putting the burden to work through the posting process should
> fall on the LD folks. If you don't want them to post in this manner then it
> is your responsibility to mechanize LUGNET to facilitate switching posting
> IDs.
Agreed.
> The discussion about how much of a nuisance it is to change posting IDs was
> pretty detailed (I think it was Larry P. who summarized the process) when
> you first implemented the posting restricition.
And I'll be happy to dredge up that post if you forgot how much of a
nuisance it is. I just now went through it to get this particular client PC
authorised and it is a significant amount of time to change settings...
FUT admin.nntp
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416?
|
| "LUGNET Admin" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:3af8cf68.292414...net.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) official (...) use (...) free (...) I read this article this morning and my initial thought was "great, here we go again". Let's alienate (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
