 | | Re: Surely this is not legal —David Eaton
|
| | | (...) I'm going to kinda agree with Geoffrey here. This COULD be illegal, except I don't think Lego will care, really, unless this turns into some sort of lucrative market. The images presented are under Lego's copyright. Lego has asked that no sets (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Surely this is not legal —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | (...) It would make sense for many Europeans that pay connection charges on a time basis - S&H may end up being FAR less than the connect charges to download them. Of course, a full dump of Brickshelf would take several CDs - one of these days, I'm (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Surely this is not legal —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) Agreed, but for MOST people (which is what I was trying to say) it's pretty useless. That's not to say there aren't exceptions to the rule. Kinda like shell promo sets selling for ridiculous prices or some such. It'd be pretty stupid for ME to (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Surely this is not legal —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | Pretty much my point. Not distinctly illegal, (other than the obvious intellectual property issue), but exceedingly stupid since you can get most of them free. Also, you'd have to have most of the sets anyway just to build what you see in each (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
