 | | Re: Lego New is Up (and ALREADY a mistake)
|
|
Well, the new Bulk pages already have a mistake - the 2x6 bricks use a picture of a 2x8 - wasn't that an OLD error that they never fixed? They had a perfect opportunity to fix it with the update, and blew it. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Well, Looks like they are in the process of updating their DNS so it will have (mostly) propogated by tomorrow. Here's what the LEGO.COM dns servers are reporting for query lego.com: DNS101.TELIA.COM: No response (Doh!) DNS102.TELIA.COM: No (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <BXL34@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:MABBIBJJFOJIOHD...wru.edu... (...) versions... (...) is (...) Are those small changes part of the new site though? It certainly looks the same to me - maybe I haven't looked deep enough. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | RE: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) It's up for me... Maybe the people who don't see it have cached versions... One thing I noticed is better names for the bulk parts (ex: Train window is only in parentheses, the main name is Wall Element). --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Maybe in your corner of the universe... not in mine. :) Looks like lego.com may be experiencing that weird slow progression again... James (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
? not yet ? the same ! when ? ;-) play well Michel Roijen (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Then what is new? Not the home page, bulk pages, catalog... Jude (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego New is Up
|
|
(...) Yah, I just checked it out -- it won't work for me. Evidently, the "Low-Band No Flash Site" still needs Javascript. :-( I haven't visited www.lego.com for almost a year now, due to their various user-hostile publishing policies... Cheers, - (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Lego New is Up
|
|
Hi folks, Thought I'd point out the the new Lego site is up. Jeff (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0qIz0.MGG@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) to (...) pointless (...) No worries, Scott. That's how I saw [your post] at least, not to say that others didn't see it differently. And yes, there are many (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) TK, just need a clarification-- do we send all of our LEGO to *you*, or is the party line an admonition to the world to send *us* their LEGO? (...) Speaking of a good time, I was just thinking about how nice it will be in AZ pretty soon-- I (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) I (...) It the Australian nationl dish: (URL) A (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) Marmite!?! What does marmite mean? Jude (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) It is his job. (...) Now I am disappointed. I have no hate in me for anyone or anything, although I do have a particular dislike for marmite. :-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
For someone to go out of their way to inform Lugnet of announcements, etc.... it sure does seem like we could be a tad bit more grateful... not hateful... G (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) your (...) I have no specific issue which gets to me, I just have a general feeling of apathetic malcontempt. Everything from the way from the way the 2001 "leak" was handled to the way TLC appear to have swept over complians about having (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | What if 9V went away? (Was re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
|
(...) I think I would remain active in Lego Trains. Whether or not I stayed with 9V or converted to the putative new system depends on the details. I convert all my 12V stuff to 9V, not because (V is better than 12V operationally, (it isn't, 12V has (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | RE: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Or pleasently surprised, I would guess :) Benjamin Whytcross BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au Ph: (03) 9856 5282 Directory Technology Pty Ltd 1/436 Elgar Road, Box Hill, 3128 Growing older is compulsory..Growing up isn't :-) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Scott, Do What I'm doing down here in Australia. Have very little to no expectations. That way you're rarely disappointed, and occasionally pleasantly surprised. Glad to say I haven't been disappointed yet ;) Santosh (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) OK. One more time. Let's all remember this, the offical party line is: Send me all your Lego pieces. There, that should do it. Let's party. -- Terry (the Critical Sycophant) K -- (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
