 | | Re: Now here's a big one.
|
|
Do you have a link to where I could find a picture of this catalogue page? The one on brickshelf only shows 1986 Technic kits, and no space shuttle! -- Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde (Remove spamblock to reply.) "Adrian Egli" <aegli@san.rr.com> wrote in (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jan-03, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Now here's a big one.
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:H85IuE.LMG@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) :-) (...) I *love* this idea. In fact, TLC and NASA have a "deal" anyway (TLC is using it to promote imagination) and TLC even when as far to match (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: What a downer :-( ...and we still will hang on....
|
|
(...) I really do beleive that what we say here really does make a difference. The discusion of technic being alive and why it should be has been going on hear for maybe over a year. We may have covered groud that lego cheifs may not have realised. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: What a downer :-( ...and we still will hang on....
|
|
I had some coffe and read this thread. I got to thinking about the range of Technic parts and brick. I figure what falls into a Technic part catagory is so essential to building stuff that moves or helps form features, that it could never go away. I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: What a downer :-(
|
|
One idea has crept into my mind. Maybe, it's just one of those years? I thought back to the mid 80's and looked at some of my US LEGO brochures to check out what was out then. As I remembered it, Technic was rather thin. One important note: this is (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
