 | | Re: All this fuss about service packs and accessories
|
|
(...) Very true, no sales = no profit. LEGO is going to offer what they want , where they want. The best that most of us can hope is the better stuff gets to where we are. I'd love for everything to be available everywhere, I don't know if that will (...) (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: All this fuss about service packs and accessories
|
|
(...) Note, very importantly, that the online order numbering system and the telephone order numbering system differ; online is "X00018nnn0000" and online has been "P002nnnn". I did my ordering, and proxy ordering, by telephone; in part this was to (...) (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
|
"Marc Nelson Jr." <manjr@bricksonthebrain.com> wrote in message news:GCvF8n.60F@lugnet.com... (...) It's (...) Of course, the worse thing you can do if you suspect someone of secret dealings is to expose them. Don't be surprised if the next time (...) (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
|
And another thing... Why is there so much secrecy surrounding any information coming from LEGO? It's like dealing with the NSA. Examples: #1: The recent "Train Summit". All of the particiapants were required to sign a non-disclosure agreement. Why? (...) (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
|
"Tomas Clark" <tomas.clark@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:GCvDvB.3Do@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) I thought this section was very well done. More the same please. regards lawrence (23 years ago, 5-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
