Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 04:01:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12548 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, David Koudys wrote:
> > In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
> > > In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
>
>
> > It's difficult to see what exactly your point is at this time. If you want to
> > discuss TLC's 'bad decisions', again. I'm all for it. If you want to prove that
> > this is one, you have as yet to make a coherent or cohesive arguement, and any
> > points you have made thus far have been refuted (even through deletions by you).
> >
> > My Pappy used to have an expression--'Put up or shut up'.
> >
> > (or is that crossing the liine with these new 'time out' things?)
> >
> > Dave K
>
> My deletions are needed as A) it's part of the TOU & B)The server wont let you
> repost anything as long as your replies are getting with out snipping.
>
> As for coherent & cohesive there's pleny of people who agree with me. Your
> twisting things around however to excuse the fact that TLC bungeled this does
> not change the fact that they choose to market the set as being limited.
> Changing their mind for whatever reason or twist of logic does not change the
> fact that they turned their back on the consumers whom were told that this was a
> limited set.-Ken
It is you who are twisting the facts to suit your flawed opinion. In my
country, as well as the US of A, by law a party is onnocent until proven guilty.
You have as yet to prove TLC's guilt in this case. Since you have continuously
deleted all valid points made by your opposition without once refuting any
points listed, as well as having all your points refuted continuously, well,
that's that.
And hiding behind the TOU? If you made any effort to refute any of the points
listed, that issue becomes null and void--an idea that you seem to not
comprehend.
And you keep mentioning that TLC turned their backs on the consumers. How? By
offering the consumers a set the consumers want? Specifically with regard to
the 10152, show me how TLC turned their backs? I have talked to many people who
are excited, adn many have posted here on LUGNET with enthusiam about hte
re-release of this set. So where does that get us? You have your camp, I have
mine. Which is better?
Finally, I have stated this over and over again and yet you delete, obfuscate,
and adhere to your bottom line, which, as shown by all evidence, proves you to
be wrong. But you still adhere to it. You obviously haven't convinced ne that
you're even remotely right, nor, by your apparent lack of debating the actual
issue, does it seem this is going to change. We're done.
Dave K
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) Dave, as you write yourself, you have stated things over and over again. But you have not convinced me. And I have not seen a single pro-TLC posting within the German AFOL community. They are obviously tending towards Ken's opinion as I do. (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| SNIP (...) SNIP (...) I don't know about your country but here that only applies in a court of law. I am certainlt alowed to come to a decision based on the facts at any time I wish. (...) Ok so it's not in the terms of use but I've read it (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) My deletions are needed as A) it's part of the TOU & B)The server wont let you repost anything as long as your replies are getting with out snipping. As for coherent & cohesive there's pleny of people who agree with me. Your twisting things (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
