Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:20:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12548 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
> > In lugnet.lego, David Koudys wrote:
> > > In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
> Finally, I have stated this over and over again and yet you delete, obfuscate,
> and adhere to your bottom line, which, as shown by all evidence, proves you to
> be wrong. But you still adhere to it. You obviously haven't convinced ne that
> you're even remotely right, nor, by your apparent lack of debating the actual
> issue, does it seem this is going to change. We're done.
>
> Dave K
Dave,
as you write yourself, you have stated things over and over again. But you have
not convinced me. And I have not seen a single pro-TLC posting within the German
AFOL community. They are obviously tending towards Ken's opinion as I do. Some
people do not care at all. And I myself should not care as well, because I never
bought a set 10152 and I will not buy one unless they are doing one in grey
instead of bley.....
Nevertheless I am deeply disappointed by TLC. They called the set limited in
Germany and gave certain numbers. They said this would be the last chance for
fans to get Mearsk bricks from TLC. (Then the base for these statements chaged
as you said - I know that point of yours, but still disagree strongly).
I had partly lost my faith in statements from TLC and this has now again come
worse. That is why I am thinking this rerelease is so bad. They could have
solved this so easy by changing the set number by one digit or changing the
package design (or changing from bley to grey :-). That would have caused some
minor costs, but now they have bad reputation due to this very thread (and
others all over the web and real world). I am sure this loss of reputation is by
far more cost effective than a the costs for a change.
Happy new year!
Ben
P.s.: I think if you are done with Ken, then we are done as well. And this means
at this very point, that you have decided to devide the community.
Do you really think we cannot live within one community and have different
opinions? I prefer 7-wide trains and still 8-wide Homa and John are friends of
mine.....
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) Hey Ben, I have, and he has, and we all have stated our POV over and over again. The thing is, the points that Ken made were refuted by others, as well as myself, in this very thread. These points were not addressed but summarily deleted, and (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) It is you who are twisting the facts to suit your flawed opinion. In my country, as well as the US of A, by law a party is onnocent until proven guilty. You have as yet to prove TLC's guilt in this case. Since you have continuously deleted all (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
