Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:39:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12485 times
|
| |
|
|
SNIP
> > > > In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote:
SNIP
> It is you who are twisting the facts to suit your flawed opinion. In my
> country, as well as the US of A, by law a party is onnocent until proven guilty.
I don't know about your country but here that only applies in a court of law. I
am certainlt alowed to come to a decision based on the facts at any time I wish.
> You have as yet to prove TLC's guilt in this case. Since you have continuously
> deleted all valid points made by your opposition without once refuting any
> points listed, as well as having all your points refuted continuously, well,
> that's that.
>
> And hiding behind the TOU? If you made any effort to refute any of the points
> listed, that issue becomes null and void--an idea that you seem to not
> comprehend.
Ok so it's not in the terms of use but I've read it somewhere and the fact is
that if your reply is not something like 90% of the original message the server
kicks it back and asks you to edit it. If your messages wern't so long and
wandering I wouldn't HAVE to do any snipping.
SNIP
> Finally, I have stated this over and over again and yet you delete, obfuscate,
> and adhere to your bottom line, which, as shown by all evidence, proves you to
> be wrong. But you still adhere to it. You obviously haven't convinced ne that
> you're even remotely right, nor, by your apparent lack of debating the actual
> issue, does it seem this is going to change. We're done.
>
> Dave K
The evidence shows no such thing. I keep "sticking to the bottom line" because
Lego wrote a few short sentances which have meaning. You on the other hand want
to write paragraph after paragraph as to what YOU think they meant and what YOU
think their intention was. I don't have to go to such lenghts because I can read
what they said.-Ken
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) It is you who are twisting the facts to suit your flawed opinion. In my country, as well as the US of A, by law a party is onnocent until proven guilty. You have as yet to prove TLC's guilt in this case. Since you have continuously deleted all (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
