Subject:
|
Re: 10152 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:11:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7804 times
|
| |
|
|
John wrote:
> Look, people, in the long run, this isn't about whether my or anyone
> else's precious collectible will appreciate or not; it is about LEGO
> preserving their integrity. Isn't that what is most important?
What's the use of integrity, if they go broke?
Lego is a company, companies must generate profit or they will disappear,
sales (mostly) generate profit ==> Lego should sell things. As many as they
can. Not create artificial 'limited editions'. Period.
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://w1.161.telia.com/~u16122508/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://w1.161.telia.com/~u16122508/gallery/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Are you implying that profitability and integrity are mutually exclusive? I hope not. JOHN (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) Guten Tag, Rene! Hope fatherhood is treating you well:^D Thanks for bringing this into the discussion. It seems this information makes the case a little stronger against TLC. It's simply reckless and dishonest to advertise in this manner, IMO. (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
