Subject:
|
Re: 10152 Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:34:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8275 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Anders Isaksson wrote:
| |
John wrote:
| |
Look, people, in the long run, this isn’t about whether my or anyone
else’s precious collectible will appreciate or not; it is about LEGO
preserving their integrity. Isn’t that what is most important?
|
What’s the use of integrity, if they go broke?
Lego is a company, companies must generate profit or they will disappear,
|
Are you implying that profitability and integrity are mutually exclusive? I
hope not.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) No, I'm implying that listening to the groans from a minute part of a minor part of the customer base is not sound business. Making money is. (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) What's the use of integrity, if they go broke? Lego is a company, companies must generate profit or they will disappear, sales (mostly) generate profit ==> Lego should sell things. As many as they can. Not create artificial 'limited editions'. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
