The LEGO Company : 2953


LEGO Company / 2953

Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! —John Neal
(...) It was correct, until TLC decided to make it incorrect by consciously changing their mind. (...) I think so. Then we would have recognized it as the typical BS advert hype which we all know to ignore. (...) Are you by chance a lawyer, Dave? If (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)

	Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! —Steve Bliss
	(...) Uh, John. That is what Jake said. Well, he certainly didn't say claim anything stronger than that -- actually, what he said was more low key, if anything. (URL) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)

		Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! —John Neal
		(...) That's not how I took it. But look at the way it was explained to the Germans via their liason (thanks to Rene's post): (URL) Doesn't get more clear than that IMO. JOHN (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)

			Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! —David Koudys
			(...) What is even more clear is that, at the time, TLC stated 'we have such-n-such quantity of Maersk Blue in stock and want to do something with it. Since, at htis time, we don't have a contract with Maersk for anything, we'll get rid of our stock (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)

	Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! —David Eaton
	(...) Perhaps I just read all statements from Lego as possibles, whereas others read them as 100% definites. Let's look at Jake's post: (URL) As many of you have seen from the leaked pictures online, we have released a > (...) Interpretation: Fact. (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)

	Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! —Scott Lyttle
	snippage (...) more snippage (...) John, I hate to be nitpicky here (oh, wait, half the posts on this thread are about being nitpicky), but I thought the color of set 10052 was yellow.. (URL) a different story... Scott (19 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)