To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 2962
2961  |  2963
Subject: 
Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego
Date: 
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:53:05 GMT
Viewed: 
8147 times
  
In lugnet.lego, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.lego, Steve Bliss wrote:
   In lugnet.lego, John Neal wrote:

   Then they should say that! “This might be the last chance to get Maersk blue because we have no more Maersk blue pellets left and no plans to create more!”

Uh, John. That *is* what Jake said. Well, he certainly didn’t say claim anything *stronger* than that -- actually, what he said was more low key, if anything.

That’s not how I took it. But look at the way it was explained to the Germans via their liason (thanks to Rene’s post):

http://news.lugnet.com/lego/?n=2943

Doesn’t get more clear than that IMO.

JOHN

What is even more clear is that, at the time, TLC stated ‘we have such-n-such quantity of Maersk Blue in stock and want to do something with it. Since, at htis time, we don’t have a contract with Maersk for anything, we’ll get rid of our stock and that’ll be it’

But why should that negate future business dealings that may arise with Maersk? Because TLC stated that “We’re getting rid of excess and since we don’t have a contract, this’ll be it?” I’d say that TLC is fully within their rights as a company to enter into contracts with any company they feel like having dealings with. At the time, no contract with Maersk so “this is it guys, buy ‘em while you can!” That stated, even explicitly as shown here, does not negate future contracts with Maersk and future pieces of Maersk Blue.

No one in TLC has a crystal ball. Come on, you know better than to ask for that kind of assurance--you don’t get that from any other company so why are you looking for it from TLC?

Differentiate from business decisions made ‘at the time’ and hindsight.

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
 
(...) That's not how I took it. But look at the way it was explained to the Germans via their liason (thanks to Rene's post): (URL) Doesn't get more clear than that IMO. JOHN (19 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)

257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR