| | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! David Eaton
| | | (...) What constitutes actual advertising versus an employee stating something incorrectly? Was the phrasing of the post on 1000steine run by Lego's legal department, just as a paid advertisement would be? If they had instead said "This MIGHT be (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | | | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! John Neal
| | | | | (...) It was correct, until TLC decided to make it incorrect by consciously changing their mind. (...) I think so. Then we would have recognized it as the typical BS advert hype which we all know to ignore. (...) Are you by chance a lawyer, Dave? If (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! Steve Bliss
| | | | | | (...) Uh, John. That *is* what Jake said. Well, he certainly didn't say claim anything *stronger* than that -- actually, what he said was more low key, if anything. (URL) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! John Neal
| | | | | | | (...) That's not how I took it. But look at the way it was explained to the Germans via their liason (thanks to Rene's post): (URL) Doesn't get more clear than that IMO. JOHN (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! David Koudys
| | | | | | | (...) What is even more clear is that, at the time, TLC stated 'we have such-n-such quantity of Maersk Blue in stock and want to do something with it. Since, at htis time, we don't have a contract with Maersk for anything, we'll get rid of our stock (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! David Eaton
| | | | | | (...) Perhaps I just read all statements from Lego as possibles, whereas others read them as 100% definites. Let's look at Jake's post: (URL) As many of you have seen from the leaked pictures online, we have released a > (...) Interpretation: Fact. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene! Scott Lyttle
| | | | | snippage (...) more snippage (...) John, I hate to be nitpicky here (oh, wait, half the posts on this thread are about being nitpicky), but I thought the color of set 10052 was yellow.. (URL) a different story... Scott (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | | |