 | | Re: 10152 Update —Ronald Borchert
|
| | | (...) Hi, very poor try of irony, Larry, you normaly write better ones ;-) To make a serious theme out of this: It's for sure a good deal for TLC when Mearsk wanted them to re-release the ship. But that they now decided to make the same model again (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 10152 Update —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | (...) That would be an incredibly stupid business decision. (...) Number 1 isn't correct as Maersk wouldn't get their set now. They would have to wait while TLC developed a new set and got approval for it from Maersk, developed new instruction (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10152 Update —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | | Hello! (...) For me (for me) Maersk blue was always quite useless, in terms of building. Before 10152 this colour was virtually not available at all, and through 10152 we got only a small range of parts that was also declared never to be enhanced in (...) (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 10152 Update —Tim David
|
| | | | (...) I'm not bothered either way how many Maersk blue 10152s are made and for how long (I might even get one this time round, its a cool set and I was flat broke last time!). However Its the DARK blue one I was waiting for, it not regular blue. Tim (20 years ago, 19-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
