Subject:
|
Re: MicroMOC: Hot pursuit in the city
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:45:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4304 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Tore Eriksson wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.microscale, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
I don’t have *computer* problems, all our computers work fine for all the
other things I and the rest of my family want to do. I have a *software*
problem with LDD, in that it has unreasonable system requirements, in my
view.
|
---8<---
| |
I think LDD is a great thing, but I think the requirements for it were
improperly spec’ed. LEGO seems to have a habit of this, we’ve seen it in
other software as well.
|
I really agree on that. For me, it’s the graphics card that “insufficient”.
If my memory serves me well, my largest GCA has 4 Mb and LDD requires 16
Mb(!)
|
Yes, I have the same limitation.
| |
Now, I don’t know what LDD does, but I really doubt that it’s really
necessary with 16Mb at the grafics card. I’ve seen lots of very impressive
graphics at my PC without those requirements met.
|
Indeed, the Ldraw suite of tools can produce results of similar quality with
much lower system requirements.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MicroMOC: Hot pursuit in the city
|
| (...) ---8<--- (...) I really agree on that. For me, it's the graphics card that "insufficient". If my memory serves me well, my largest GCA has 4 Mb and LDD requires 16 Mb(!) Now, I don't know what LDD does, but I really doubt that it's really (...) (20 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
