 | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) Well being an ambassador I want to try and shed some light on this. First we do have to sign an NDA. This is understandable given the fact that LEGO doesn't want information being leaked before a product gets to market. With that said does the (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) This time around, are the ambassadors going to be given anything to communicate back to the communities they've been picked from? It seems that the first round were all immediately given NDAs to sign, preventing them from divulging any (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) Fine, I've removed .nz from the crossposting. Tim (21 years ago, 5-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.loc.hk, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| (...) Although more people applying would be nice to see, the real requirement is better people applying. Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 5-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.nz, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.loc.hk, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Cycle 2
|
| In lugnet.lego, Richie Dulin wrote: <snip> (...) Those two statements don't contradict one another, from what I see... It's like "We'll accept applications from all over the world!" If only Canadians send in applicaitons, then only Canadians will (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-05, to lugnet.lego) !
|
|
