 | | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) You mean Brad didn't just fire back a quick and timely response to your query? Gee, will wonders never cease...and you were polite and everything too! What was the point of your being on Lugnet again, Brad? -- Richard (26 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego blew it AGAIN...
|
|
(...) I went there, but apparently more pocket change is needed: There was an internal error on the server in processing this request. -Tom McD. when replying, most restaurant servers have internal errors processing spamcake requests. (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) What was the point of your post, Richard? To make fun of Tim because he didn't know that TLC wouldn't respond in a timely manner? Or to take the opportunity to take another shot at Brad? Didn't your mother ever tell you that if you don't have (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) too! (...) Actually Richard, Lego is handling most responses by direct e-mail it seems. My post the other day about mindstorms got a direct response from the person in charge of the tour. I imagine that Tim's question might have gotten a (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: "Chrome" sets 4816-19
|
|
(...) I think it's pretty clear that I am not suggesting even one thing against Mr. Coats. I and a few others have asked the very question that Coats is asking and received no replies at all. Some people jumped all over me because they thought my (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
